<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
  <titleid/>
  <issn>2304-9472; e-ISSN: 2949-3501</issn>
  <journalInfo lang="ENG">
    <title>Russia in the Global World</title>
  </journalInfo>
  <issue>
    <number>25</number>
    <altNumber> </altNumber>
    <dateUni>2022</dateUni>
    <pages>1-190</pages>
    <articles>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>7-22</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7068-0185</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Nechai</surname>
              <initials>Aleksandra</initials>
              <email>alimova_aa@spbstu.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Relations Between Russia and China in the 1990s</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The retrospective analysis offered in this study helps the trace the evolution in the development of Russian-Chinese relations in the 1990s and outline the key periods during their vector changed, as well as the trace of the reasons ouing to the difference in social systems and ideologies did not become an obstacle to the bilateral partnership. The method of historical retrospection as the method of document analysis were used during the study. The main sources for the study of interstate relations were the statements of the leaders of Russia and China, as well as joint communiqués signed during the exchange visits of the heads of Russia and China, because these sources most clearly reflect the intentions and goals of the parties. The scientific novelty of this work lies in the previously unprecedented comprehensive analysis of China-Russia relations in the 1990s through the prism of joint interstate documents published in Chinese language. The relevance of this work lies in the fact that Russian-Chinese relations, which evolved in the 1990s, have become a solid foundation for relations between Russia and China in the 21st century. The author concludes that in last decade of the XX century China and Russia, having made the necessary conclusions from the mistakes of the past, stopped considering the social systems and ideological similarities and differences as necessary conditions for the development of inter-state relations and began to put national interests first, which helped them to agree on major issues of the modern world order: multipolarity of the world, opposing hegemony, maintaining global strategic stability and become reliable strategic partners. This result was achieved by joint cooperation of the two sides, respect for each other and consideration of mutual interests. The scientific significance of the research is determined by the fact that its materials can contribute to further deepening and expanding the study of the problems of interaction between the PRC and the Russian Federation in complex historical conditions at the turn of the XX–XXI centuries. Previously, the author proposed a study of the Soviet-Chinese relations in the 1980s. This article is intended to take the next step – to study no less interesting and resonant period in the development of bilateral relations after the collapse of the USSR.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/RG/RGW.25.1</doi>
          <udk>327 (470:510)</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>Russian-Chinese relations</keyword>
            <keyword>dissolution of the Soviet Union</keyword>
            <keyword>Russia</keyword>
            <keyword>China</keyword>
            <keyword>multipolarity</keyword>
            <keyword>Russian-Chinese negotiations</keyword>
            <keyword>Russian-Chinese communiqué</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.1/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-7-22.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>23-41</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0002-3833-516X</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Dziuba</surname>
              <initials>Elena</initials>
              <email>dzyuba_ev@spbstu.ru</email>
              <address>Saint Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0002-4778-4346</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Sverdlovsk Regional Bar Association</orgName>
              <surname>Belosludtsev </surname>
              <initials>Alexander N. </initials>
              <email>S-andro@yandex.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">The Image of the Arctic in Modern Russian Mass Media</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article presents an overview of scientific publications on the theme diversity and conceptual content of the Russian-language mass media texts about the Arctic; semantic dominants are listed and the peculiarities of their linguistic expression in these texts about the region are determined. The list of thematic dominants, previously interpreted by researchers, has been supplemented by one more concerning the need for the application of intellectual resources and creativity in relation to the development of the Arctic. Lexical units that represent this issue are enumerated. Some metaphors and metaphorical models representing the image of the Arctic in mass media (anthropomorphic, sociomorphic, naturomorphic, artifact) are identified; the gastronomic metaphorical model is described in more detail, the linguistic units relevant to the model (predicate and attributive) are analyzed, some additional typical situations related to the gastronomic metaphor in the theme field «Arctic Exploration» are mentioned. The use of linguistic research methods (contextual, conceptual, propositional analysis, as well as the method of cognitive modeling) allowed us to conclude about the actualization of two evaluation vectors in mass media: vectors of humane, careful, reasonable and creative attitude to the Arctic – on the one hand, pragmatic, consumption – on the other.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/RG/RGW.25.2</doi>
          <udk>327+81</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>the Arctic</keyword>
            <keyword>image of the Arctic in mass media</keyword>
            <keyword>media image</keyword>
            <keyword>metaphorical image of the Arctic</keyword>
            <keyword>gastronomic metaphor</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.2/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-23-41.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>42-52</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0002-5523-5793</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Saint-Petersburg State University</orgName>
              <surname>Alizade </surname>
              <initials>Eldar</initials>
              <email>ea042@mail.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Formation and Development of Russian-Azerbaijani Cultural Ties: 1992‒2022</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Modern Russian-Azerbaijani cultural ties reflect general trends and features of modern bilateral cooperation, they are distinguished by diversity and depth. In April 2022, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Azerbaijan celebrated the 30th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations. Despite of all the contradictions, Russian-Azerbaijani ties gradually are strengthened, primarily due to cultural exchanges. The Russian and Azerbaijani sides attach great importance to the development of cultural and humanitarian spheres in bilateral relations, which is reflected in the Declaration on Allied Cooperation (2022). This article discusses the stages of the formation of Russian-Azerbaijani relations in the field of culture and the processes that accompanied them. The article attempts, on the basis of various materials and sources, to identify and evaluate the cultural dialogue between Russia and Azerbaijan, the factors influencing bilateral cooperation, and also to assess the possible prospects for cultural ties. The study reveals the potential of bilateral cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Azerbaijan. The choice of the chronological framework of the study is due to turning events in bilateral relations, as cultural cooperation has become a "platform" for interstate dialogue. The research is based on the analysis of interstate programs, treaties and declarations of cooperation in the field of culture and humanitarian cooperation.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/rg/RGW.25.3</doi>
          <udk>327</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>culture</keyword>
            <keyword>cultural diplomacy</keyword>
            <keyword>Russian Federation</keyword>
            <keyword>Azerbaijan</keyword>
            <keyword>diaspora</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.3/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-42-52.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>53-72</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0003-3910-1223</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>The Saint Petersburg Electoral Commission</orgName>
              <surname>Shapchits </surname>
              <initials>Pavel A.</initials>
              <email>shaptchits@gmail.com</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Open Voter Lists as a Guarantee of Equal Suffrage and Non-Distortion of Election Results: Experience of CIS Member States</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article gives a constitutional legal and organizational and technical assessment of the concept of open voter lists in the scope of the national legislations of the CIS member states, as well as issues of its practical implementation. Theoretical and practical objections to the opening of voter lists in the Russian Federation are analyzed. The author considers the exclusion of the "double count" of voters with active suffrage and the exclusion of the opportunity to vote for voters for various third parties to be the two key aspects of the implementation of the principle of equal suffrage. Both require a thorough development of the regulatory, organizational and technical base for voter lists: their compilation, clarification, amendment, disclosure of them for all participants in the electoral process. The recent legislative changes in Armenia, which provide for the publication of signed voter lists on the Internet, as well as the more established practice of open electronic lists and biometric identification of voters in Kyrgyzstan, are considered. This practice is compared with the issues that arise in the implementation of the "Mobile voter" mechanism, and other problems of ensuring the principle of equal suffrage in the Russian Federation. The author substantiates the position on the priority of the norms of the legislation on elections and referendums in relation to the legislation on personal data and concludes that it is necessary to extend the successful experience of Armenia and Kyrgyzstan to other CIS member states, including the Russian Federation. As conclusions, proposals are formulated to improve the legislation of the Russian Federation on elections and referendums, providing for the complete opening of voter lists both before and after voting day with the possibility of mass automated data processing. It is proposed to simplify and fully automate the "Mobile voter" mechanism, eliminating the risk of the human factor from this process.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/rg/RGW.25.4</doi>
          <udk>342.841.2+342.843.5+ 342.845.2</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>double voter count</keyword>
            <keyword>double voting</keyword>
            <keyword>cruise voting</keyword>
            <keyword>'Mobile voter' mechanism</keyword>
            <keyword>absentee voting</keyword>
            <keyword>Armenia</keyword>
            <keyword>Kyrgyzstan</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.4/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-53-72.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>73-90</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Volgograd Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA</orgName>
              <surname>Yakovleva </surname>
              <initials>Daria I.</initials>
              <email>ddashaa211@gmail.com</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Volgograd Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA</orgName>
              <surname>Lukyanovskaya </surname>
              <initials>Olga V. </initials>
              <email>istor@vlgr.ranepa.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Role of the UN in Anti-Trafficking with Children</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The problem of slavery and exploitation of minors, which is characterized by the statistical data of the UN Special Rapporteur, is an international problem. The analysis of the role of the UN, the measures taken by this organization, the nature of the international regulatory framework for solving this problem are the focus of the author's interest. The theoretical significance of the work is reflected in numerous works on this topic, mainly foreign, which indicates the relevance of this problem in other countries. The findings of the study can be implemented in the practice of organizations for the protection of children's rights, to solve the problem of child exploitation and slavery at the national level. The UN Office points out that to date, the percentage of convictions by the organizer of child trafficking remains at a low level, as well as victims who have been exploited and enslaved do not receive proper assistance. The analysis of the role of the UN in the fight against trafficking in children allowed us to discuss some measures that will increase the effectiveness of solving this problem, for example, such as: strengthening existing domestic mechanisms that are aimed at combating trafficking and slavery of children, as well as the need to develop and implement such mechanisms in cases of their absence in individual countries.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/rg/RGW.25.5</doi>
          <udk>341.1/8</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>slavery</keyword>
            <keyword>rights and freedoms</keyword>
            <keyword>exploitation</keyword>
            <keyword>child trafficking</keyword>
            <keyword>UN</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.5/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-73-90.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>91-106</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0001-6171-2122</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Li </surname>
              <initials>Xiaoxuan </initials>
              <email>sherrysuan931009@mail.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">The Role of Confucianism in the Domestic Politics of Modern China</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article considers the relevant aspects of Confucian political tradition in the context of its significance for the modern Chinese system of government. The essential feartures Сhinese political traditions, based on of the analysis of Confucian philosophy, the essential features of Chinese political tradition are highlighted. Among them the ideas of great unification, the doctrine of medianism, political order as the basic value of state system and the importance of virtue and ritual in politics are of particular importance. Consistent development of these philosophical and cultural values in modern China has helped to establish a strong historical tradition of public administration to achieve impressive results in social and economic development. In the long history of China's political development, considerable rich experience in public administration was accumulated, a systematic Confucian tradition of political management was formed and a theoretical system with a focus on natur, the focus on people. This system played an important role in maintaining the stability of government and protecting the interests of the people. Based on the analysis of the key tenets of Confucianism, The provisions, based on the analysis of the key tenets of Confucianism, demanded in the practice of the organization of political power in modern China are formulated. The modern importance of Confucianism is highlighted by the increasing attention to this political-philosophical tradition of the part of the Communist Party of China, which is reflected in the appeal to Confucian ideas in the public speeches of the Chinese head of state Xi Jinping. The underlying ethical and politico-legal values of Confucianism have significant implications for various aspects of China's social and economic development, including responsible environmental stewardship. The demand for Confucian ideas confirms their cultural significance and special political role.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/rg/RGW.25.6</doi>
          <udk>17:57</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>ideology</keyword>
            <keyword>public administration</keyword>
            <keyword>communist Party</keyword>
            <keyword>tradition</keyword>
            <keyword>virtue</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.6/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-91-106.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>107-122</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0002-7195-5723</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University</orgName>
              <surname>Khabdulina </surname>
              <initials>Maral K.</initials>
              <email>mk_khabdulina@mail.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0002-0829-0319</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University</orgName>
              <surname>Tleugabulov </surname>
              <initials>Daniyar T. </initials>
              <email>danchitto@mail.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <authorCodes>
              <researcherid>Q-7224-2016</researcherid>
              <scopusid>6508050731</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0003-4103-7785</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Lbova</surname>
              <email>lbovapnr5@gmail.com</email>
              <address>Russia, 195251, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG"/>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Scientific self-reflection, which correlates with the understanding of research activities, has recently acquired the character of a necessary contextual study of the development of processes that influenced the formation of modern knowledge. Cooperation between Kazakhstan and Russia in the field of archeology and the preservation of cultural heritage has a rich history, which is due to the common destinies of the two countries and geographical proximity. The article focuses on the experience of cooperation in the field of studying the historical and cultural heritage of the Great Steppe and its contextual analysis. The publication presents a wide range of problems in the study of archaeological sites, ranging from the first attempts to fix the cultural identity of new lands during the development of Central Asia by Russia; the organization of scientific expeditions and the results of their work, to large-scale interdisciplinary projects in modern times. The dynamics of Kazakh-Russian cooperation is shown, with a conditional allocation of three periods, against the background of the development of archeology as a science in both countries. The turning points of the institutional development of Kazakhstani archeology are noted, such as the organization of the Turkestan circle of archeology lovers, the formation of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR and the Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography. Ch. Valikhanov, and then the Institute of Archeology A. Kh. Margulan with a wide range of international programs. Cooperation between the two countries has great prospects for further development, in which the new flagships of science, research universities, will probably play the main role.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/RG/RGW.25.7</doi>
          <udk>902.2+930.1</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>historical and cultural heritage</keyword>
            <keyword>Russia</keyword>
            <keyword>Kazakhstan</keyword>
            <keyword>Great Steppe</keyword>
            <keyword>archaeological research</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.7/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-107-122.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>123-134</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Chi </surname>
              <initials>Qingzhuo</initials>
              <email>chitszho@gmail.com</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Regional Cooperation Between the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China (on the Example of Hainan Province Before the Covid Crisis of 2019)</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Regional cooperation between the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China developed fruitfully and successfully before the covid crisis. This cooperation between China and Russia is one of the most discussed topics in the world. Regional cooperation between the two countries is a solid foundation for political mutual trust and mutual benefit and serves the interests of the two countries. The study of the issue of cooperation is very important, because the People's Republic of China is considered today as the most important partner of the Russian Federation in Asia, both in terms of priorities and prospects for further cooperation. Russia is also a major strategic partner in the political and economic fields for China. The particular note is the cooperation of the Russian Federation with the Chinese province of Hainan. The study of the history and the main directions of cooperation is the main purpose of this article. The article provides the comprehensive analysis of the main directions of regional cooperation. Particular attention is paid to specific areas of cooperation between Hainan Province and the regions of the Russian Federation: Murmansk, Vladivostok, Kaliningrad, in the field of tourism. Much attention is paid to cooperation in the economic field, a number of agreements have been signed with the Moscow region. Currently, the "Chinese Hainan Free Trade Port" is being built, which should play a big role in the development of cooperation between Hainan Province and Russia. Russia is a priority partner of Hainan Province. The existing potential of local cooperation within the framework of the "year of local cooperation and exchange between China and Russia" is a guarantee of comprehensive cooperation between the two countries. The result of cooperation is clearly shown by the increase in trade and the emergence of new promising areas in strategic cooperation between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation. All this will contribute to further strategic cooperation between two countries.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/rg/RGW.25.8</doi>
          <udk>327</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>People's Republic of China</keyword>
            <keyword>Russian Federation</keyword>
            <keyword>Hainan Province</keyword>
            <keyword>strategic partnership</keyword>
            <keyword>cooperation</keyword>
            <keyword>cooperation</keyword>
            <keyword>tourism</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.8/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-123-134.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>135-147</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0002-2562-5897</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Lagoyko </surname>
              <initials>Anastasia G.</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0003-2977-7262</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Boldyreva</surname>
              <initials>Elena</initials>
              <email>boldyreva_el@spbstu.ru</email>
              <address>Saint Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Organizational Structure of Tourism Management in Finland (Case of South Karelia)</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">To plan and implement a national policy in the field of tourism, as well as to coordinate efforts for its implementation, the state creates tourism management bodies. Understanding the needs of tourists and monitoring the performance of the tourism industry requires knowledge and coordinated action at different levels of government. Finland's new tourism strategy was published in July 2022. The update clarified measures of strategy realization due to the coronavirus pandemic and the changed geopolitical situation. The update focused on bringing future perspectives and measures in line with the new situation. One of the objectives of the strategy is to aim for Finland to become the number one tourist destination in Northern Europe. For the successful accomplishment of the goals of the strategy, the need for close cooperation between authorities of different levels and areas of activity in the frames of state programs is emphasized. The article considers the hierarchy of tourism management in Finland, taking South Karelia region as an example for the purpose of this study to understand who will carry out cooperation on the implementation of the updated strategy. With the help of content analysis, classifications of tourist regions in Finland were considered. The main stakeholders, Based on English and Finnish language sources, were identified and distributed at three levels - national, regional, local. As the result, the scheme for managing of tourism activities in South Karelia gives a clear understanding of the main participants in the tourism sector in accordance with their operational level, scope of duties and field of activity.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/RG/RGW.25.9</doi>
          <udk>338.48</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>tourism</keyword>
            <keyword>Finland</keyword>
            <keyword>South Karelia</keyword>
            <keyword>development strategy</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.9/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-135-147.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>148-170</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <researcherid>H-4865-2016</researcherid>
              <scopusid>57193690516</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0001-9760-2443</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Sidorchuk</surname>
              <initials>Ilya</initials>
              <email>chubber@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>Polytechnicheskaya 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG"> "We Must and Will Fly Higher, Farther and Faster than Everyone Else": Aviation in Soviet Cinema of the 1920s and 1930s.</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Both cinema and aviation were objects of close concern with the Bolshevik authorities. The popularity, demand and comparative accessibility of cinema could not but attract attention to it as a means of agitation, political and cultural education of the population, including the illiterate, and aviation was a symbol of the “technological sublime” and a condition for the successful protection of the country from enemies. The purpose of this article is to consider the importance of cinema in the formation of Soviet aviation discourse in the 1920s – 1930s. To solve it, the main reasons for turning to aviation in early Soviet cinema were identified, the features of its use and presentation were analyzed, and the role of cinema in the transformation of its image was assessed. The main source base consisted of movies, directly dedicated to the “conquest of the sky” and those thanks to whom it became possible – pilots, engineers, etc., as well as materials about films published in Soviet periodicals. Methodological guidelines of the study are related to the concept of social construction of technology (SCOT), proposed by V. Biyker and T. Pinch. Also, during the preparation of the article, an appeal was made to the methods of visual culture research, in particular, the principles developed within the framework of cultural studies, which involve attention to the specifics of technological image mediators, the socio-cultural context of image production and consumption, the construction of ideological cultural and social models. The results of the study showed that the Soviet film industry sought to organically adapt its products to the general aviation discourse, covering various aviation issues as much as possible. The cinema was designed to solve several tasks at once: to create an attractive image of aviation, to mobilize the population to participate in the construction of the air fleet, to heroize and idealize those associated with aviation – pilots and aircraft designers. Separately, it is worth noting the large number of female pilots in the cinema of the early Soviet period, which should have become an obvious symbol of gender equality. There are also many films and animated films aimed for children’s audience, the purpose of which was to attract to the theme of conquering the sky, the promotion of modeling and the dissemination of technical knowledge. All this contributed to the elimination of aviation illiteracy, the integration of aviation into everyday life, the construction of its understanding by the masses as a necessary condition and symbol of the beautiful Communist future.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/rg/RGW.25.10</doi>
          <udk>93/94</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>history of aviation</keyword>
            <keyword>cinematography</keyword>
            <keyword>aviation discourse</keyword>
            <keyword>history of science and technology</keyword>
            <keyword>history of leisure</keyword>
            <keyword>early Soviet society</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.10/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-148-170.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>171-185</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <researcherid>E-3947-2016</researcherid>
              <scopusid>23971572500</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0002-6249-8057</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Institute of Archeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk, Russia</orgName>
              <surname>Tabarev</surname>
              <initials>Andrej</initials>
              <email>olmec@yandex.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0002-5877-2148</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences</orgName>
              <surname>Maltseva </surname>
              <initials>Anastasia I. </initials>
              <email>a.maltseva4@g.nsu.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0003-3209-6716</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Novosibirsk State University</orgName>
              <surname>Portnova </surname>
              <initials>Arina A. </initials>
              <email>a.portnova@g.nsu.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="004">
            <authorCodes>
              <orcid>0000-0003-1602-8262</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Novosibirsk State University</orgName>
              <surname>Fedorova </surname>
              <initials>Anastasia A. </initials>
              <email>a.fedorova3@g.nsu.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Archaeology of Southeast Asia in the Works of Russian Researches: Problems, Projects and Perspectives</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Against the background of the rich scientific contribution of Russian ethnographers, historians and politologists to the study of traditional and modern culture of the peoples inhabiting Southeast Asia, the experience, geography and thematic accents of Russian archaeology so far are presented and voiced in an appropriate form not so properly. In this paper, "scientific contribution" means its broad content – not only the acquisition of new materials and new knowledge, but also its significance for the development of the scientific field (Russian archaeology) as a whole, the forms of organization and implementation of scientific researches (expeditions, work with collections, analysis of literature), the effectiveness of their use by different generations of specialists, incorporation to the system of formation of scientific stuff and improving their qualifications on the example of specialization of students of Novosibirsk State University. The authors provide a general overview of the history and development of this trend in Russian archaeology from the end of the XIXth century to the present time, focus on the most important publications and activities of individual specialists, and also turn to significant projects of recent decades related to new themes (Neolithic, burial practices, megalithic complexes). As a result of the review, confidence is expressed in the perspectives of further researches on the archaeology of Southeast Asia, taking into account such important factors as the development of student specialization, strengthening and expanding the circle of contacts with colleagues from the countries of the region, as well as consolidating the efforts of Russian specialists in archaeology, ethnography, history and cultural studies.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.48612/RG/RGW.25.11</doi>
          <udk>902/904</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>Southeast Asia</keyword>
            <keyword>archaeology</keyword>
            <keyword>Stone Age</keyword>
            <keyword>publications</keyword>
            <keyword>projects</keyword>
            <keyword>specialization</keyword>
            <keyword>collaboration</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://russiaglobal.spbstu.ru/article/2022.22.11/</furl>
          <file>RvGM-25-(48)---ORIGINAL-MAKET-171-185.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
    </articles>
  </issue>
</journal>
